Thursday, 31 January 2013
BREAKING: Paul Lambert appointed as managing director of Twitter
BREAKING: Paul Lambert appointed as managing director of Twitter - immediately sending the social network site down. -- BBC Sporf (@BBCSporf)
Valve sued in Germany over game ownership
Users should be able to resell the games they own, says the Federation of German Consumer Organizations
By Loek Essers | 31 January 13
Read more: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/game/3423715/valve-sued-in-germany-over-game-ownership/#ixzz2JZ2GF8Kn
The Federation of German Consumer Organizations (VZVB) has sued computer game distributor Valve because it prohibits Steam-gamers from reselling their games.
In theory, a Steam user could download a game, burn it on a CD and resell it, she said. In most cases, though, buyers wouldn't be able to play the game they purchased because the games are linked to a user account and without the key for that specific account, online only games are not playable, she said.
Because Valve forbids its users to sell or transfer their accounts to another person, the exchange of games that can only be played online is impossible, she said. This means that a Steam user only partially owns games, Elbrecht said. "If I pay the full price for a game, then why am I not allowed to do with it what I want," she added.
Valve was warned in September by the VZVB to change this practice, but the company did not comply with the federation's demands. Therefore, the federation sued the company in the District Court of Berlin on Wednesday.
Valve did not respond to a request for comment.
The VZVB sued the game distributor for similar reasons once before, Elbrecht said. That case went all the way to the German Federal Court of Justice, which ruled in 2010 that Valve did not violate German law by prohibiting the transfer of user accounts.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), however, ruled in July that the trading of "used" software licenses is legal and that the author of such software cannot oppose any resale.
While the CJEU's case is not exactly the same as the current litigation against Valve, the VZVB reckons that the ruling gives sufficient basis for a new lawsuit, Elbrecht said. She expected the litigation to go on for years, and it will probably end up at the federal court again, she said.
Nevertheless, a new lawsuit is useful, she said. Besides raising awareness of the issue and possibly changing the minds of the judges, the litigation is also meant as a signal to other game distributors that have the same practices, she said.
While Valve was unwilling to change its practices on this point, it promised to change the way it gets users' consent when it changes its terms and conditions. The last time Valve changed the terms and conditions for Steam, users were unable to play their games if they did not accept the new rules, Elbrecht said.
Valve promised to adjust the mandatory consent to let users who don't want to accept the new terms in the future to still be able to play their purchased games.
George Gallaway's response to David Cameron after Commons exchange on Jihadist regimes
@georgegalloway responds to PM's vile personal attack on his politics & the blatant sidestepping of a crucial question. http://t.co/rimMAN7J -- Lisa Linton (@LLCoolJayne)
Bradford West MP George Galloway responded to Prime Minister David Cameron's refusal to answer a parliamentary question, by resorting to a cheap insult, by detailing the Arab tyrannies and puppet presidents Britain backs.
'I asked a reasonable question, to detail the difference between the jihadists in Mali we oppose and the jihadists in Syria we back and in response to a legitimate inquiry I received a sneering insult more fitted to the gutters of Eton than the Mother of all Parliaments,' Galloway said. 'Britain is guilty to backing the worst, most bloodthirsty dictators in the world, bar none. This country backs and arms the foul Saudi Arabian sheikhdom which has the least democracy and probably the worst human rights record on the planet.
Then there's Bahrain. And what about Egypt where this government backed Mubarak until almost the end? And it is less than a week ago, isn't it, that the Foreign Office was warning British citizens to get out of Benghazi immediately for fear of their lives - at risk from the same jihadis we supplied, armed and fought for.'
Galloway added: 'I have written to the Prime Minister today about his response to me and I will be interested how he responds.'
Below is the text of the letter:
Wednesday 30th January 2012
Dear Prime Minister,
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
Response to David CameronBradford West MP George Galloway responded to Prime Minister David Cameron's refusal to answer a parliamentary question, by resorting to a cheap insult, by detailing the Arab tyrannies and puppet presidents Britain backs.
'I asked a reasonable question, to detail the difference between the jihadists in Mali we oppose and the jihadists in Syria we back and in response to a legitimate inquiry I received a sneering insult more fitted to the gutters of Eton than the Mother of all Parliaments,' Galloway said. 'Britain is guilty to backing the worst, most bloodthirsty dictators in the world, bar none. This country backs and arms the foul Saudi Arabian sheikhdom which has the least democracy and probably the worst human rights record on the planet.
Then there's Bahrain. And what about Egypt where this government backed Mubarak until almost the end? And it is less than a week ago, isn't it, that the Foreign Office was warning British citizens to get out of Benghazi immediately for fear of their lives - at risk from the same jihadis we supplied, armed and fought for.'
Galloway added: 'I have written to the Prime Minister today about his response to me and I will be interested how he responds.'
Below is the text of the letter:
Wednesday 30th January 2012
Dear Prime Minister,
I'm sure on reflection you will realise that your answer to me today was beneath you and unbecoming for a British Prime Minister. I will deal with the complete absence of a substantive reply in a moment. But let me deal first with the vulgar abuse.
I do not support any Arab dictatorship, unlike you. It is you who is selling weapons to the dictatorship in Saudi Arabia and providing military training there. It is you who is supporting the Bahraini dictatorship. It is you who supported the Mubarak dictatorship until its last hours. Ditto the late dictatorship in Tunisia, Yemen etc. It is you who has the warmest possible relations with the dictatorships in the Gulf. I could go on, believe me. I, on the other hand, have spoken, written and broadcast against all Arab dictatorships. Perhaps your staff, in preparing your reply, will provide you with the evidence of this. I also read Frankenstein until the end.
I told one of your predecessors, Lady Thatcher, on the eve of the triumph of those whom your party routinely described as 'Afghan freedom fighters' that she "had opened the gates to the barbarians.... And that a long dark night would now descend upon the people of Afghanistan". I warned repeatedly against the folly of the creation of the Arab-Afghan force which became Al Qaida. Immediately after 9/11 I said in the House that "I despise Osama Bin Laden, the medieval obscurantist savage. The difference is that I have always despised him. I despised him when you (pointing at the Tory benches) were giving him guns and money".
I find it genuinely inexplicable that you are doing it all over again. This is a tragedy which begins to look farcical when one considers the issue which I raised today with you. We are now killing Al Qaida in Mali and helping Al Qaida kill in Syria - killing Christians, killing Shiites, killing Kurds, killing Druze, killing Sunnis who won't join their jihad, and soon, trust me, they will be killing each other.
There may be "key differences" between Al Qaida in Mali and their counterparts in Syria. I asked you to explain these to the House today. You refused. But it is a question which will not go away before a puff of vulgar abuse.
I look forward to your reply. I am seeking to publish this letter.
Yours sincerely, George Galloway MP
The school system is failing, and has been failing for two dumbed down generations
There's little doubt that school examinations are easier than ever before. All this talk that they are more robust and that pupils are brighter is utter nonsense. From the 1970s each and every year has seen a dumbing down in testing with pupils getting more and more aide in terms of preparation for 'beating the exam'. By this I mean that the pupil doesn't necessarily understand the subject at great length, but now knows the tools in which to pass it. Passed paper questions for example nearly mirror what you get in an examination.
The major problem is that many years ago pupils could be organised into bands quite simply by how successful or unsuccessful they were. My brother for example, had C, D, E in his A Levels compared to my B, B, C. Does that make him less knowledgeable than myself? Of course not. I would argue he is around 50 times more insightful and intelligent than me. He sued to answer 15-1 questions at a breeze whilst I struggled with almost all.
It's just in the past my brothers grades for example meant something. Even that 'E' in whatever he had was quite precious and demanded that a lot of work and knowledge needed to achieved to even reach this level. Quite honestly, his C, D, E would no doubt be A, A, A now. This in my mind is where the fundamental problem lies.
Children have been programmed and have been subject to propaganda that they are special, that they can't fail and that everyone can achieve something. This has led to decreased knowledge levels but a plethora of A grades across the board. Employers can now no longer see the wood from the trees. How the hell can they expect to get the best candidate when everyone has a dozen A* grades? The standard certainly hasn't increased at all in my opinion with knowledge, intellect and behavious at a lower standard than in the past.
It's this socialist 'everyone gets an apple' mentality flung in from the left that's destroying our children by brain-washing them that everyone is supreme. We are not preparing any child that simply hasn't got it, for failure in later life. Something that will make them stronger and get a non-academic job. A 'C' grade should be a damn fine achievement. The only difference between pupils now is that the best pupils just get a 'shinier apple'.
It's the same in areas such as discipline and attendance where the under-achievers get incentives to even attend school and the good children who tow the line get bugger all. In my school experience one of my best friends didn't miss a day in the entire Secondary School years. What did he get? A Parker pen! Meanwhile Planky down the road was receiving £5 vouchers here there and everywhere just for turning up and trashing the library. The system is arse backwards. Like always.
Instead of catering for the achievers and letting the chaff go to waste (as is life and natural selection), the focus is on the 10% who cause the maximum carnage whilst the achievers get less attention. Then, the difference between the best and worst is massaged as everyone gets decent grades being coached through past papers and linear generic questions where even getting your name right gets 10 marks.
One last anecdote. Our best pupil when I was in school in the 90's was a boy called Zeeshan Ashraf. He would regularly get 90-95% in all tests, exams, past papers etc. He was a little genius. But when given an old school past paper from a generation before, he came up short getting 70%. Don't ask what the rest of us had! It was an eye opener and proof that the system is failing children in duping them into believing that they can be something a academically and not preparing them for the harsh realities that is life and in some cases failure. It's exactly the same where everyone and their dog goes to University, does David Beckham studies, and wonder why life isn't going anywhere.
Now, no little Johnny can fail. Everyone gets a pass. But nobody gets jobs.
The major problem is that many years ago pupils could be organised into bands quite simply by how successful or unsuccessful they were. My brother for example, had C, D, E in his A Levels compared to my B, B, C. Does that make him less knowledgeable than myself? Of course not. I would argue he is around 50 times more insightful and intelligent than me. He sued to answer 15-1 questions at a breeze whilst I struggled with almost all.
It's just in the past my brothers grades for example meant something. Even that 'E' in whatever he had was quite precious and demanded that a lot of work and knowledge needed to achieved to even reach this level. Quite honestly, his C, D, E would no doubt be A, A, A now. This in my mind is where the fundamental problem lies.
Children have been programmed and have been subject to propaganda that they are special, that they can't fail and that everyone can achieve something. This has led to decreased knowledge levels but a plethora of A grades across the board. Employers can now no longer see the wood from the trees. How the hell can they expect to get the best candidate when everyone has a dozen A* grades? The standard certainly hasn't increased at all in my opinion with knowledge, intellect and behavious at a lower standard than in the past.
It's this socialist 'everyone gets an apple' mentality flung in from the left that's destroying our children by brain-washing them that everyone is supreme. We are not preparing any child that simply hasn't got it, for failure in later life. Something that will make them stronger and get a non-academic job. A 'C' grade should be a damn fine achievement. The only difference between pupils now is that the best pupils just get a 'shinier apple'.
It's the same in areas such as discipline and attendance where the under-achievers get incentives to even attend school and the good children who tow the line get bugger all. In my school experience one of my best friends didn't miss a day in the entire Secondary School years. What did he get? A Parker pen! Meanwhile Planky down the road was receiving £5 vouchers here there and everywhere just for turning up and trashing the library. The system is arse backwards. Like always.
Instead of catering for the achievers and letting the chaff go to waste (as is life and natural selection), the focus is on the 10% who cause the maximum carnage whilst the achievers get less attention. Then, the difference between the best and worst is massaged as everyone gets decent grades being coached through past papers and linear generic questions where even getting your name right gets 10 marks.
One last anecdote. Our best pupil when I was in school in the 90's was a boy called Zeeshan Ashraf. He would regularly get 90-95% in all tests, exams, past papers etc. He was a little genius. But when given an old school past paper from a generation before, he came up short getting 70%. Don't ask what the rest of us had! It was an eye opener and proof that the system is failing children in duping them into believing that they can be something a academically and not preparing them for the harsh realities that is life and in some cases failure. It's exactly the same where everyone and their dog goes to University, does David Beckham studies, and wonder why life isn't going anywhere.
Now, no little Johnny can fail. Everyone gets a pass. But nobody gets jobs.
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
'Sultan George' phones banks and says he was racially abused
Mega gross...
This has to be the funniest thing I have ever seen. http://t.co/QzYUrEYm -- Mr Trollington (@Sultan_George)
A Cunningham, stalking horse question PMQs
If you missed the brilliant tory stalking horse question from @ACunninghamMP, the video is here: http://t.co/9Tr4NBzB -- Harry Cole (@MrHarryCole)
Why it's time to dump Chrome for Waterfox
I have held Chrome in high regard ever since I was converted from Firefox some years ago. To me it was radical and beautiful and I thought I had found my perfect match. If it was love then, then divorce is very much on the cards now.
From the early years of Internet Explorer, users wanted something stable and yet responsive. These were painful times where browsers would crash continually, the computer would hang for what seemed like hours and reboots were regular events. Then we had the first semblance of change when I was experimenting with Opera and Firefox. I liked Opera don't get me wrong, but there was just something not quite 100% right with it whether it was the layout or colour palette I do not know.
So I became convinced by Firefox. I used Firefox for many years but was always aware that text didn't seem as bold as later versions of IE which may have been a settings issue on my behalf. But then Chrome came on the scene. It had the crisp boldness that Firefox didn't, it was faster than Firefox and more stable than any other browser. It soon overtook everything.
However, I like many became aware that good things never last. Google's obsession with trying to get every last scrap of information about you and trying to 'all in one' the user with Chrome, Gmail and any other Google product that they can database you into, started to make me feel uneasy. As an engineer, this last few months I have felt a little uneasy about recommending Chrome and Gmail. Gmail targets you with ads whilst I have felt the Chrome experience worse and worse. Finally, I think I have snapped.
I had been having issues with my old Athlon machine running Chrome for some time, but nothing too dramatic. I have however, felt that pages were becoming more and more unresponsive and that crashes were getting more frequent. Roll on this last few months where I have purchased a low-mid range gaming rig, and Chrome has let itself down badly. It may be the latest releases combined with my new spec, but things 'are a'changing' as one grumpy old veteran once said.
Running Chrome on my 64-bit Quad-Core 4170 is like buying a lottery ticket. You're literally crossing your fingers in the hope that you can get through a session and be the lucky winner that can avoid crashes or system failures. Chrome has just become so unstable, so unusable and plain unresponsive that enough is enough. It constantly hangs the computer literally sending Windows into a state of paralysis of which pressing reset is the only remedy. I have given Chrome the benefit of the doubt over the last 6 months, as I see it as something that has well deserved my recommendations to others. But I cannot go on recommending any further. I am currently using Waterfox which is supposedly a 64-bit specialised version of Firefox, so we'll see where that takes me.
But for now, Chrome is on the back burner. It's been a hell of a ride Chromey, but you just ain't cutting it any more!
From the early years of Internet Explorer, users wanted something stable and yet responsive. These were painful times where browsers would crash continually, the computer would hang for what seemed like hours and reboots were regular events. Then we had the first semblance of change when I was experimenting with Opera and Firefox. I liked Opera don't get me wrong, but there was just something not quite 100% right with it whether it was the layout or colour palette I do not know.
So I became convinced by Firefox. I used Firefox for many years but was always aware that text didn't seem as bold as later versions of IE which may have been a settings issue on my behalf. But then Chrome came on the scene. It had the crisp boldness that Firefox didn't, it was faster than Firefox and more stable than any other browser. It soon overtook everything.
However, I like many became aware that good things never last. Google's obsession with trying to get every last scrap of information about you and trying to 'all in one' the user with Chrome, Gmail and any other Google product that they can database you into, started to make me feel uneasy. As an engineer, this last few months I have felt a little uneasy about recommending Chrome and Gmail. Gmail targets you with ads whilst I have felt the Chrome experience worse and worse. Finally, I think I have snapped.
I had been having issues with my old Athlon machine running Chrome for some time, but nothing too dramatic. I have however, felt that pages were becoming more and more unresponsive and that crashes were getting more frequent. Roll on this last few months where I have purchased a low-mid range gaming rig, and Chrome has let itself down badly. It may be the latest releases combined with my new spec, but things 'are a'changing' as one grumpy old veteran once said.
Running Chrome on my 64-bit Quad-Core 4170 is like buying a lottery ticket. You're literally crossing your fingers in the hope that you can get through a session and be the lucky winner that can avoid crashes or system failures. Chrome has just become so unstable, so unusable and plain unresponsive that enough is enough. It constantly hangs the computer literally sending Windows into a state of paralysis of which pressing reset is the only remedy. I have given Chrome the benefit of the doubt over the last 6 months, as I see it as something that has well deserved my recommendations to others. But I cannot go on recommending any further. I am currently using Waterfox which is supposedly a 64-bit specialised version of Firefox, so we'll see where that takes me.
But for now, Chrome is on the back burner. It's been a hell of a ride Chromey, but you just ain't cutting it any more!
Tuesday, 29 January 2013
Media is to Blame for Politicians' Unpopularity Says @IainDale
Media is to Blame for Politicians' Unpopularity Says @IainDale http://t.co/usEo8OmH -- Guido Fawkes (@GuidoFawkes)
Evil Kagawa tells Mancini Balotelli secrets
I say to Mancini, "Balotelli plan to smasher your wife back door in before he leave." Look at face of Mancini, so funny http://t.co/KEA1GKvm -- Evil Kagawa (@evilkagawa)
Politicians repeatedly not answering questions - made me smile
Can politicians answer a question? And should the interviewer keep asking? Watch a few top names in action: http://t.co/rTAS6ro4 #bbcdp -- DailySunday Politics (@daily_politics)
Monday, 28 January 2013
Eskisehirspor 1-0 Orduspor
Orduspor player sent off for second yellow in the 20th minute in the box. Penalty saved. All the home side, away side camped in their 18 yard box. Another red second half. 89th minute penalty. Sods law. Referee raped Orduspor.
David Icke - How Iceland overthrew the banks, the only 3 minutes worth listening to from Davos
How Iceland Overthrew The Banks: The Only 3 Minutes Of Any Worth From Davos http://t.co/D163o7Rm #Iceland #Davos #Grimsson -- David Icke (@davidicke)
Monday, 28 January 2013 09:16
Posted by David Icke
'"Why do we consider banks to be like holy churches?" is the rhetorical question that Iceland's President Olafur Ragnar Grimson asks (and answers) in this truly epic three minutes of truthiness from the farce that is the World Economic Forum in Davos. Amid a week of back-slapping and self-congratulatory party-outdoing, as John Aziz notes, the Icelandic President explains why his nation is growing strongly, why unemployment is negligible, and how they moved from the world's poster-child for banking crisis 5 years ago to a thriving nation once again.'
Bank of England's admitted £600billion gift to wealthy would pay off half the national debt
Bank of England's admitted £600billion gift to wealthy would pay off half the national debt:- http://t.co/A3pk0Dl3 -- Hari RippedOffBriton (@RippedOffBriton)
Iceland refuses to cover the debts of the bankers
Iceland refuses to cover the debts of the bankers. Iceland wins. http://t.co/P7lG6IwE -- Old Holborn (@Old_Holborn)
Soft underbelly continues to hamper Liverpool's prancers
Liverpool were dumped out of the FA Cup yesterday. Nothing wrong with that. Indeed, even the final score of Oldham 3-2 Liverpool may suggest that the Reds were just outperformed on the day and that football is a 'funny old game'. But the issues are deeper, because this is precisely the type of match that marks what sort of underbelly the team have. The games where when the going gets tough, the millionaires dig in and find some professional expertise.
Yesterday showed once again that Liverpool just haven't got what it takes currently when you scratch away the glossy veneer. Suarez was a constant threat and had a wonderful game. One gets the impression these are the sort of games that he thrives on, with the picture in my head of him as a boy scrapping for every 50/50 on the streets of Uruguay with bigger, tougher men. He likes the physical side of English football and he always attacks every game with a chip on his shoulder like he's got something to prove. And this is our best player!
The problem is the other players. Players like Allen, Sterling, Coates, Borini. To me, they just embody everything wrong with the Liverpool team. Even players like Skrtel and Agger with their big masculine tattoos are so over-rated and don't really like a fight that it betrays their hard man image that they try and portray. Indeed, it took the introduction of a proper grafter in Gerrard to get the ship back on course, unlucky not to score late on, he was a constant menace and embodied the roll your sleeves up approach.
Liverpool have too many pansy 'footballers' and not enough players that want to get down and dirty. Oldham must have been salivating at the prospect of playing THAT team yesterday when the team sheet came their way. Tottenham and Chelsea have similar weaknesses that their hard men are just pussy cats in disguise. Compare and contrast these fairy teams to Manchester United (whom I despise, but respect) and the difference is night and day. I may be putting my head on the block here but the impression is that these players really have the mental toughness and a much harder physical presence to get the job done. Ferguson is the sort of manager that wants to see his side literally crawl off the pitch in a cup tie. The impression yesterday of some of the Liverpool 'day dreamers' is that this cup tie was wholly inappropriate to their character.
And it's in the league too where any side comes and has a go gets something out of the game. Liverpool just want the opposition to engage them in a game of pure football of you have it we have it. Unfortunately some teams know that half the game is in the head and to get amongst the prancers is to see their game plan unfold rather quickly.
Congratulations to Oldham. Enjoy your run!
Yesterday showed once again that Liverpool just haven't got what it takes currently when you scratch away the glossy veneer. Suarez was a constant threat and had a wonderful game. One gets the impression these are the sort of games that he thrives on, with the picture in my head of him as a boy scrapping for every 50/50 on the streets of Uruguay with bigger, tougher men. He likes the physical side of English football and he always attacks every game with a chip on his shoulder like he's got something to prove. And this is our best player!
The problem is the other players. Players like Allen, Sterling, Coates, Borini. To me, they just embody everything wrong with the Liverpool team. Even players like Skrtel and Agger with their big masculine tattoos are so over-rated and don't really like a fight that it betrays their hard man image that they try and portray. Indeed, it took the introduction of a proper grafter in Gerrard to get the ship back on course, unlucky not to score late on, he was a constant menace and embodied the roll your sleeves up approach.
Liverpool have too many pansy 'footballers' and not enough players that want to get down and dirty. Oldham must have been salivating at the prospect of playing THAT team yesterday when the team sheet came their way. Tottenham and Chelsea have similar weaknesses that their hard men are just pussy cats in disguise. Compare and contrast these fairy teams to Manchester United (whom I despise, but respect) and the difference is night and day. I may be putting my head on the block here but the impression is that these players really have the mental toughness and a much harder physical presence to get the job done. Ferguson is the sort of manager that wants to see his side literally crawl off the pitch in a cup tie. The impression yesterday of some of the Liverpool 'day dreamers' is that this cup tie was wholly inappropriate to their character.
And it's in the league too where any side comes and has a go gets something out of the game. Liverpool just want the opposition to engage them in a game of pure football of you have it we have it. Unfortunately some teams know that half the game is in the head and to get amongst the prancers is to see their game plan unfold rather quickly.
Congratulations to Oldham. Enjoy your run!
Football Tips - Orduspor +0.5 & Grenada +1.5
Eskisehirspor v Orduspor (Turkish League) 5pm
Orduspor to win +0.5
£10 @ 1.99
Eskisehirspor will be playing their 3rd game in 7 days, and Pit feels that they may be running on empty after a very good cup win in the week. Meanwhile Orduspor have a knack of taking points off the bigger teams and the game could be a very low scoring tactical affair.
FC Sevilla v Grenada (Primera) 8.30pm
Grenada to win +1.5
£5 @ 1.99
Granada have a win and a draw against their last two league opponents so they have decent enough form coming into this game. They'll be a lot of pressure on Sevilla at home for the remainder of the season and sometimes teams come unstuck with the crowd getting on their back. They have lost 3 and drawn one at home so they are as vulnerable as anybody down the bottom in dropping points.
Orduspor to win +0.5
£10 @ 1.99
Eskisehirspor will be playing their 3rd game in 7 days, and Pit feels that they may be running on empty after a very good cup win in the week. Meanwhile Orduspor have a knack of taking points off the bigger teams and the game could be a very low scoring tactical affair.
FC Sevilla v Grenada (Primera) 8.30pm
Grenada to win +1.5
£5 @ 1.99
Granada have a win and a draw against their last two league opponents so they have decent enough form coming into this game. They'll be a lot of pressure on Sevilla at home for the remainder of the season and sometimes teams come unstuck with the crowd getting on their back. They have lost 3 and drawn one at home so they are as vulnerable as anybody down the bottom in dropping points.
Labels:
eskisehirspor,
fc sevilla,
football tips,
grenada,
orduspor
Sunday, 27 January 2013
Inter Milan 2-2 Torino
Inter scored from free kick early first half. Not much creativity. Torino scored from defensive mistake by Inter. Torino the busier in terms of pressuring. Inter seem to let opposition play too much. Very slow tempo from Inter. Seem to defend the half way line.
Slow second half start. Torino then just waltzed out of defence down the right, two passes, a cross along floor across the six yard box and a tap in. Very bad defending from front to back. Too easy. Cambiasso on 52 minutes. Inter upped tempo and pressed higher. Cambiasso scores 66. Inter pressing the game. Inter get to by line, cut back, Cambiasso scores 8 yards out.
70 Torino scramble on Inter line. Inter very lucky. Torino attacking too, wide open. Late 70s Torino looking to break, Inter slightly slower pace but Torino defending the 18 yard box, easier for Inter to get right to around 30 yards out. 84 golden chance to cross for Torino, striker shot miles wide. A cross along floor would have been a goal. 93 Torino should have had free kick edge of box not given. Torino another chance in 94, keeper saved for Torino hat-trick.
Superb performance from Torino.
Slow second half start. Torino then just waltzed out of defence down the right, two passes, a cross along floor across the six yard box and a tap in. Very bad defending from front to back. Too easy. Cambiasso on 52 minutes. Inter upped tempo and pressed higher. Cambiasso scores 66. Inter pressing the game. Inter get to by line, cut back, Cambiasso scores 8 yards out.
70 Torino scramble on Inter line. Inter very lucky. Torino attacking too, wide open. Late 70s Torino looking to break, Inter slightly slower pace but Torino defending the 18 yard box, easier for Inter to get right to around 30 yards out. 84 golden chance to cross for Torino, striker shot miles wide. A cross along floor would have been a goal. 93 Torino should have had free kick edge of box not given. Torino another chance in 94, keeper saved for Torino hat-trick.
Superb performance from Torino.
One man's take on the BBC as an ex 'customer' of theirs.
One man's take on the BBC as an ex 'customer' of theirs. 'Conniving, low-down scumbags'. The BBC is a total joke. http://t.co/T7IoDbvf -- BanTheBBC (@banthebbc)
Anonymous hits US government site, threatens release of secrets
Hack claimed the suicide of Aaron Swartz as its spark
By Martyn Williams | 27 January 13
Read more: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/security/3422762/anonymous-hits-us-government-site-threatens-release-of-secrets/#ixzz2JCpoyY00
Hackers working under the name of the Anonymous hacktivist collective hit a U.S. government website on Saturday, replacing its home page with a 1,340 word text detailing its frustrations with the way the American legal system works and a threat to release "secrets" gathered from U.S. government websites.
The website of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which establishes sentencing policies for the federal court system, was offline for much of Saturday as a result of the attack.
"This mornings cyber attack on the Commissions website www.ussc.gov brought it down temporarily, but the site now has been restored," the commission said in a brief statement issued on Saturday evening. "The Commissions publications, training materials, and federal sentencing statistics are again readily accessible to visitors to the site."
The site and timing of the attack was not random, according to the message that replaced the home page before it was taken offline.
"Two weeks ago today, a line was crossed," the message read. "Two weeks ago today, Aaron Swartz was killed. Killed because he faced an impossible choice. Killed because he was forced into playing a game he could not win -- a twisted and distorted perversion of justice -- a game where the only winning move was not to play."
Swartz committed suicide in New York on Jan. 11, apparently over an upcoming trial on computer intrusion, wire fraud and data theft charges that carried a maximum penalty of 35 years in jail. The charges stem from allegations that Swartz stole millions of scholarly articles and documents from the JSTOR database with the intention of making them available online at no charge.
His suicide sparked outrage among the hacktivist community, much of which blamed the prosecution of the case and potential penalties he faced as directly contributing to his death.
"This website was chosen due to the symbolic nature of its purpose -- the federal sentencing guidelines which enable prosecutors to cheat citizens of their constitutionally guaranteed right to a fair trial, by a jury of their peers -- the federal sentencing guidelines which are in clear violation of the 8th amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishments," the message on the hacked website read.
The message went on to say that the group had infiltrated numerous U.S. government websites and gathered material it judged would be embarrassing if released.
"We have enough fissile material for multiple warheads. Today we are launching the first of these. Operation Last Resort has begun..."
The message didn't reveal the nature of the "secrets," but the hackers made available on the site a multi-part encrypted file that was said to contain them. It's impossible to determine what's actually in the files, which were named for judges on the U.S. Supreme Court.
The message went on to demand a number of reforms to the U.S. legal system.
Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com
Read more: http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/security/3422762/anonymous-hits-us-government-site-threatens-release-of-secrets/#ixzz2JCpCb2w4
Mom FLIPS out when she finds out she's going to be a grandma
Football Tips - Brugge, Udinese and PAOK
Club Brugge v Gent (Belgian League) 1.30pm
Brugge to win
£10 @ 1.84
Udinese v Siena (Serie A) 2pm
Udinese to win
£10 @ 1.76
PAOK v Xanthi (Greek League) 3.15pm
PAOK to win
£10 @ 1.52
Brugge to win
£10 @ 1.84
Udinese v Siena (Serie A) 2pm
Udinese to win
£10 @ 1.76
PAOK v Xanthi (Greek League) 3.15pm
PAOK to win
£10 @ 1.52
Prospective Tips
Ajax
Club Brugge
Utrecht
Adinyara win e/w
Vallecano over
PAOK
Over 2.5 Udinese
Zuzka 1.63 win e/w
Club Brugge
Utrecht
Adinyara win e/w
Vallecano over
PAOK
Over 2.5 Udinese
Zuzka 1.63 win e/w
Saturday, 26 January 2013
I'm bouncing like a Gummi Bear tonight
Awesome Gummi Bears
What has Britain become lol! Unemployed rapper, BEST EVER!
I've total sympathy for the unemployed, I wish nothing but the best for them. Meanwhile at Huddersfield job centre.. https://t.co/dhBkz7c7 -- Edam Dids (@MrsBumSmith)
Nigel Farage - sums Europe up
I think I know what @Nigel_Farage is getting at [PICTURE] via @PlatypusPR http://t.co/edhoWhhU -- Guido Fawkes (@GuidoFawkes)
Pirate Bay Documentary First Ever to Premiere Online and at a Major Festival
TPB-AFK, the upcoming documentary about The Pirate Bay and its founders, has a release date. The film is premiering with a prominent spot at the prestigious Berlin Film Festival on February 8. At the same time TPB-AFK will also be released for free on the Internet., making it the first film ever to premiere both online and at an A-list festival.
Hollywood often hears that they force people into pirating films by failing to make their content widely available.
It often takes months before a blockbuster movie appears online after it premieres in theaters, while the public demands instant access.
So, when a documentary is made about the founders of The Pirate Bay, things have to be done differently. And this is exactly what’s going to happen with the upcoming release of TPB-AFK.
Today it was officially announced that the documentary will premiere at the Berlin International Film Festival (Berlinale) on February 8th. This offline premiere coincides with the free online release, making it the first ever to have such a double release.
“I’m so thrilled to open the ‘Panorama Dokumente’ section of the Berlinale with the first film ever to be released for free online from an A-festival,” TPB-AFK director Simon Klose tells TorrentFreak in a comment.
“The Pirate Bay changed the film industry from the outside, I’m trying to change it from within,” he adds, hinting that it might be wise for others to follow this trend.
After seeing the TPB-AFK trailer many users and followers of the notorious BitTorrent site are excited to see the documentary. However, the film doesn’t have the classic Hollywood ending most are used to.
TorrentFreak talked to several people who’ve seen a private screener and the overall impression we got is that it’s not the most uplifting story. That doesn’t come as a surprise of course, as most of the material covers how the three founders fought their legal battles in Sweden, and lost.
Peter Sunde, one of the three founders followed in the documentary, has mixed feelings about the end result.
“It tells an important story,” Sunde tells TorrentFreak.
“I don’t want to tell too much about it because people should see it and make up their own minds. After seeing the full movie for the first time I was thinking about it for about two weeks without having an opinion or words to describe it.”
TPB-AFK highlights a lot of the negative events the three founders went through, ending with the final guilty verdict early last year. Needless to say these events had quite an impact on their lives.
“It’s still a fucked up story and the film makes me think about the past years of my life quite a lot,” Sunde says.
The Pirate Bay founder adds that he might have chosen other material to include and that many of the good parts are left out.
“It’s Simon’s decision what to include and it’s his view of our story. I like that he’s independent from us and that he’s promised to release lots of extra material for some of the things that I might have wanted to have included,” Sunde says.
Sunde concludes, however, that the director did a great job and that TPB-AFK is a must watch.
Football Tip - Eintracht Frankfurt v Hoffenheim (Bundesliga) 2.30pm
Eintracht Frankfurt v Hoffenheim (Bundesliga) 2.30pm
Eintracht to win
£10 @ 2.02
Frankfurt got beaten by Leverkusen 3-1 last league game and so they will be back for some revenge today. They are 4th in the Bundesliga and have the third best league home record losing only once so far this season. Hoffenheim are 16th out of 18 teams and haven't won in 8 league matches. Also they have shipped a staggering 41 goals, the highest in the league. At 2.02 this really is great odds, and Frankfurt should have no worries in brushing aside the relegation candidates.
Eintracht to win
£10 @ 2.02
Frankfurt got beaten by Leverkusen 3-1 last league game and so they will be back for some revenge today. They are 4th in the Bundesliga and have the third best league home record losing only once so far this season. Hoffenheim are 16th out of 18 teams and haven't won in 8 league matches. Also they have shipped a staggering 41 goals, the highest in the league. At 2.02 this really is great odds, and Frankfurt should have no worries in brushing aside the relegation candidates.
Friday, 25 January 2013
David Ward Car Crash Sky “Jews” Interview
WATCH: David Ward Car Crash Sky “Jews” Interview http://t.co/fdAA9LPU [VIDEO] -- Guido Fawkes (@GuidoFawkes)
Financials - Keep an eye
Meggitt PLC - 431
Northgate - 323
British Land - 561
Aviva - 374
Northgate - 323
British Land - 561
Aviva - 374
Newcastle striker Nile Ranger arrested on suspicion of rape (And don't forget his Twitter Rant against supporters)
11:30am Friday 25th January 2013 in News
Nile Ranger
NEWCASTLE United striker Nile Ranger has been arrested on suspicion of rape, sources said.
The 21-year-old Premier League footballer was held by Northumbria Police following an allegation made by a woman that she was attacked at a hotel in Jesmond, Newcastle between Wednesday and Thursday. London-born Ranger, who lives in Forest Hall, North Tyneside, was still being questioned today.
A police spokeswoman said: "On Thursday January 24 a woman reported to police that she had been raped overnight at a hotel in Jesmond. "A 21-year-old man has been arrested at an address in Forest Hall on suspicion of rape."
UK Economy Comments
Some comments about the economy -
"Why oh why cant it just be plain and simple - stop giving billions away in aid to foreign countries, it doesn't change a thing, stop giving billions to Europe to subsidise other countries, stop spending billions on futile wars to try and impose democracy on medieval countries that want to bomb us, stop giving billions in benefits to foreign and home grown leeches. Then maybe people will be able to afford to buy things like cars, houses and luxury items or go out without paying over the odds for food and drink. Is it really that hard to figure out? Its just a shame no politician has the balls to stand up, say it then actually do it."
"No surprise here then , how on earth do they expect the AVARGE consumer to drive a recovery when we are getting hammered from every corner , huge hikes in gas/electric , fuel costs , weekly shop, zero increase in wages ( in real terms pay cuts ) we are going to bumping along the bottom of growth for a very long time , at least big business are still making huge profit at our expense ."
"cuts cuts cuts..austerity..isnt it any wonder from this clueless lot.what else can we expect from 2 rich boys in charge of the nasty party..they will go down in history as the the only goverment to have led britain to a triple dip ressesion.what a legacy to be proud of"
"Theres a common thread in todays headlines,the economy in reverse or flatlining either way not growing,beer sales down due to taxation,fuel prices starting to spiral also consumption is very low due to taxation,IMF calling for plan B.If you tie this all up the person in the middle is George Osbourne our invisible chancellor not only the architect of Plan A also the architect of decline.Mr Cameron needs to show leadership stop posturing for the cameras and remove him and replace him with someone who understands business because clearly he does not"
"What puzzles me is - how can we expect growth, when we are forced to make cuts, and our main trading partners (europe) are in recession?."
"Why oh why cant it just be plain and simple - stop giving billions away in aid to foreign countries, it doesn't change a thing, stop giving billions to Europe to subsidise other countries, stop spending billions on futile wars to try and impose democracy on medieval countries that want to bomb us, stop giving billions in benefits to foreign and home grown leeches. Then maybe people will be able to afford to buy things like cars, houses and luxury items or go out without paying over the odds for food and drink. Is it really that hard to figure out? Its just a shame no politician has the balls to stand up, say it then actually do it."
"No surprise here then , how on earth do they expect the AVARGE consumer to drive a recovery when we are getting hammered from every corner , huge hikes in gas/electric , fuel costs , weekly shop, zero increase in wages ( in real terms pay cuts ) we are going to bumping along the bottom of growth for a very long time , at least big business are still making huge profit at our expense ."
"cuts cuts cuts..austerity..isnt it any wonder from this clueless lot.what else can we expect from 2 rich boys in charge of the nasty party..they will go down in history as the the only goverment to have led britain to a triple dip ressesion.what a legacy to be proud of"
"Theres a common thread in todays headlines,the economy in reverse or flatlining either way not growing,beer sales down due to taxation,fuel prices starting to spiral also consumption is very low due to taxation,IMF calling for plan B.If you tie this all up the person in the middle is George Osbourne our invisible chancellor not only the architect of Plan A also the architect of decline.Mr Cameron needs to show leadership stop posturing for the cameras and remove him and replace him with someone who understands business because clearly he does not"
"What puzzles me is - how can we expect growth, when we are forced to make cuts, and our main trading partners (europe) are in recession?."
GDP falls by 0.3% in the fourth quarter, leaving year-on-year economic growth flat and fears of a looming 'triple-dip' recession.
The UK's national output has fallen by 0.3% in the fourth quarter, according to the Office for National Statistics.
The contraction of gross domestic product (GDP), which was worse than most forecasts, compared to a 0.9% rise in the previous three months.
Britain now appears closer to its third recession in four years, or the so-called triple-dip recession.
GDP is seen as the broadest measure of a country's economic output, and the figure undergoes regular revision as more data reaches statisticians.
The ONS said GDP contracted partially on lower output from the North Sea resource producers and manufacturers.
Mining and quarrying also suffered its biggest fall in output since records began in 1997.
Quarries supply a range of other sectors including construction, railways and roadbuilding - including pothole repairing.
The ONS also said it was the biggest contraction in Government and other services sector since the second quarter of 2008.
The figure now raises more concerns over the economic policy of the coalition Government.
On Thursday it defended its austerity programme against criticism from the International Monetary Fund's chief economist.
The economy is now 3.3% smaller than its peak in Q1 2008, recovering only about half the output lost during the financial crisis - a worse performance than other major economies.
The disruption to North Sea oil and gas fields was partially attributed to a maintenance programme which saw the shut down of certain key pumping infrastructure.
This knocked 0.18% off GDP, while slightly smaller amounts of damage were done by a fall in factory output and in the 'Government and other services' category.
In the third quarter this sector was boosted by the London Olympics effect on sports and recreation services.
At the start of 2013 one-off factors, such as January's snow, may seal the fate of an economy on a knife-edge between growth and contraction, with major retailer John Lewis already warning that snow had hit sales growth.
Some experts believe the country can still avoid the feared return of recession.
Experts on the Sky News Money Panel had mixed feelings on the results and risk of triple-dip, ahead of the results.
Ross Walker, UK economist at RBS Global Banking & Markets, said: "I think a formal triple-dip will be narrowly avoided.
"The early signs of chaos around the January snow fall threatened to tilt the balance of risks the other way but, anecdotally, the disruption to the wider economy does not seem as bad as initially feared."
James Daley, money editor at Which?, added: It's quite possible that Britain is heading for a triple dip recession - though I think the importance of this could be overplayed.
"The economy has effectively been flatlining for almost four years now - with the odd quarter or two of growth quickly offset by a few quarters of contraction.
"Sadly, there are still no greenshoots of recovery, and with many of the public sector cuts still working their way through, 2013 looks set to be another tough year for consumers."
Asked how the retail sector could be improved, Louise George from Peter Popple's Popcorn, added: "(The Government) could offer more funding and support for small and medium-sized enterprises.
"So that they are able to grow their businesses and are able to offer lower prices to consumers through economies of scales of having more cashflow."
David Cameron tells porkies about Britain’s national debt
(Full article and comments - http://goo.gl/7qYvT)
David Cameron’s policy is to increase Britain’s debt by 60 per cent, more than any European country. To increase it more over five years than Labour did over 13 years. Just yesterday, we learned the national debt had hit £1,111 billion and it’s heading to £1,400 billion.
And then David Cameron has to go and spoil it all by telling porkies about what his government is doing to our national debt. The party election broadcast the Conservatives have just released is so astonishingly dishonest that it really would have disgraced Gordon Brown. In it, the Prime Minister tells an outright – how to put it? – untruth. He says:-
“So though this government has had to make some difficult decisions, we are making progress. We’re paying down Britain’s debts.”
David Cameron’s policy is to increase Britain’s debt by 60 per cent, more than any European country. To increase it more over five years than Labour did over 13 years. Just yesterday, we learned the national debt had hit £1,111 billion and it’s heading to £1,400 billion.
By no stretch of the English language can this be described as “paying down Britain’s debts.” What Cameron said is not an exaggeration. It’s a straight falsehood, and one that demeans his office. He has previously used different language, saying that he is “dealing with the debt”. The below graph says it all:
As Cameron says in his party political broadcast, he’s only half way through his term of office. So what progress does he intend to make on national debt in the remainder of his parliament? His deputy, Nick Clegg, has previously boasted that his government is “wiping the slate clean of debt”. An utterly misleading analogy. Here are the Treasury’s published plans:
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that David Cameron and Nick Clegg have an agreed strategy: that it is not important to tell the truth about how much debt their government is saddling voters with. That a little deception is no bad thing.
Here is the full Conservative Party election broadcast. It really is quite shameful. Financiers are, quite literally, prosecuted for this kind of thing.
As you can see, people are asked to guess how much the deficit is going down by. They guess low figures – 2 per cent, etc – and are then told that it’s actually 25 per cent. Then they say how impressed they are with the Tories. Have you spotted the trick? No normal person knows what “deficit” means, nor should they. It’s a Westminster wonk word, not even used in business. Most people will think “deficit” means “government debt”. Every time a proper poll is conducted about public perceptions about debt, it exposes the staggering extent to which people have been successfully misled. Last month, ITV – the channel the Tories chose to make this broadcast – released a poll showing just 6 per cent of the public realise that the national debt is rising. Why might this be? Is it because they’re all thick? Or is it because the Cabinet – even the Prime Minister himself – keep telling them that it’s falling?
This is not a nerdy footnote, not the same as – say – people not knowing the direction of the environmental policy. Cameron won’t be paying this debt back – the voters will. Their children and grandchildren will. I’d argue that ministers really do have a moral duty to be honest with the people who will be repaying the debts that ministers are running up. The Prime Minister has a greater duty than anyone. When he claimed debt was falling on an ITV sofa recently, you might have put it down to a slip of the tongue. But on a carefully-scripted party election broadcast?
I will ask 10 Downing St and the office of Grant Shapps how they reconcile the Prime Minister’s statement with what is actually happening to our national debt. I’ll let you know what they say.
PS: My thanks to the various people on Twitter who alerted me to this broadcast. Gordon Brown used to take the view that journalists protest the first few times a lie is mentioned, and then give up. Also newspapers never print graphs like this, so the politician can never be found out. The press has a blind spot when you lie with figures, Brown realised. Newspapers know few readers will read a column on technical gobbledegook. If you make your lie boring or technical enough, they you’ll have no real trouble. Lying with numbers was the missing chapter in Peter Oborne’s superb The Rise of Political Lying.
But in the social media era, annoying nerdy low life journalists like yours truly – tipped off by Twitter-enabled voters – have infinite energy (and space) to document every attempt by ministers to mislead. We now have toys to play with: audio, video, graphs etc. I had really hoped that, when Cameron got in, such lie-detecting tools would not be necessary.
Football Tips - Dortmund, Valenciennes and Karabukspor games
Pit was up 25.70 from yesterday's tips ensuring that we are back beyond the £50.00 mark.
Karabukspor v Kasimpasa (Turkish Super League) KO 5pm
Karabukspor to win
£10 @ 2.18
This game could be a little cracker. Karabukspor have beaten Trabzonspor and Fenerbahce both 1-3 away from home in the last two league games, a fantastic achievement. Meanwhile Kasimpasa had a very good 2-1 victory against Galatasaray at home on the 18th of January. But at odds of 2.18, Karabukspor have to be the value bet.
Dortmund v Nurnmberg (German Bundesliga) KO 7.30pm
Under 2.5 goals
£5 @ 2.92
This game is a punt. Dortmund offer no value at home and especially after their 5-0 demolition of Werder Bremen last outing. Nurnberg are very miserly though scoring 18 and conceding 23 in their 18 league games. They've only lost two of their last 8 league games with four draws on those. Since October, there's only been 2 games which have gone over the 2.5 goals a game against teams that they probably took on. Against higher ranked teams they can shut up shop for long periods. If they get through the first half at 0-0 or 1-0. Then the under 2.5 goals looks promising.
Valenciennes v Lyon
Draw
£5 @ 3.35
If I was pushed I'd call this as a 1-1 draw. Valenciennes struggled against Nice losing 5-0 away from home before drawing 1-1 with Ajaccio so it looks like they've tightened their tactics up slightly. Valenciennes are 5th in the league on home form only losing one game this season. Lyon drew 0-0 with Evian TG at home last outing something that their supporters were furious about but I think Valenciennes home advantage may just give them a point.
Karabukspor v Kasimpasa (Turkish Super League) KO 5pm
Karabukspor to win
£10 @ 2.18
This game could be a little cracker. Karabukspor have beaten Trabzonspor and Fenerbahce both 1-3 away from home in the last two league games, a fantastic achievement. Meanwhile Kasimpasa had a very good 2-1 victory against Galatasaray at home on the 18th of January. But at odds of 2.18, Karabukspor have to be the value bet.
Dortmund v Nurnmberg (German Bundesliga) KO 7.30pm
Under 2.5 goals
£5 @ 2.92
This game is a punt. Dortmund offer no value at home and especially after their 5-0 demolition of Werder Bremen last outing. Nurnberg are very miserly though scoring 18 and conceding 23 in their 18 league games. They've only lost two of their last 8 league games with four draws on those. Since October, there's only been 2 games which have gone over the 2.5 goals a game against teams that they probably took on. Against higher ranked teams they can shut up shop for long periods. If they get through the first half at 0-0 or 1-0. Then the under 2.5 goals looks promising.
Valenciennes v Lyon
Draw
£5 @ 3.35
If I was pushed I'd call this as a 1-1 draw. Valenciennes struggled against Nice losing 5-0 away from home before drawing 1-1 with Ajaccio so it looks like they've tightened their tactics up slightly. Valenciennes are 5th in the league on home form only losing one game this season. Lyon drew 0-0 with Evian TG at home last outing something that their supporters were furious about but I think Valenciennes home advantage may just give them a point.
Thursday, 24 January 2013
Craziest free kick set piece ever - Highly recommended for local league football!
This has got to be one of the craziest free kick set pieces I've ever seen -
Thai side Muangthong United's free kick drill
Thai side Muangthong United's free kick drill
Ubuntu CEO: two-year releases are only "an idea" PC Pro News
By Barry Collins
"The honest answer is I don't know if it's likely, because it's an idea at this point, and I think the idea merits discussion."
Silber denied the proposed move was to ease the strain on Ubuntu's developers, who are now working on versions of Ubuntu for smartphones, televisions and tablets as well as the PC. "It's not so much a resource-management issue as an efficiency issue," she said.
Read more: Ubuntu CEO: two-year releases are only "an idea" | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/379507/ubuntu-ceo-two-year-releases-are-only-an-idea#ixzz2ItlbYC9V
Posted on 24 Jan 2013 at 12:24
Canonical CEO Jane Silber has told PC Pro that proposals to release a new version of Ubuntu only once every two years are merely "very, very early stage discussions".
Ubuntu has been on a six-monthly release cycle since 2004, with Long Term Support (LTS) versions of the OS being released every two years. However, Canonical developers earlier this week discussed the possibility of scrapping those interim releases, with new features being introduced in rolling updates as and when they're ready.
In an exclusive interview with PC Pro, Silber said the plans are far from concrete. "This is very, very early stage discussion. Because we do things so openly, sometimes our early stage ideas get attention in the press well before they're anywhere near a decision," she said.
The honest answer is I don't know if it's likely, because it's an idea at this point, and I think the idea merits discussion
"The honest answer is I don't know if it's likely, because it's an idea at this point, and I think the idea merits discussion."
Silber denied the proposed move was to ease the strain on Ubuntu's developers, who are now working on versions of Ubuntu for smartphones, televisions and tablets as well as the PC. "It's not so much a resource-management issue as an efficiency issue," she said.
"When we started Canonical and Ubuntu in 2004 and we said we're going to release Ubuntu every six months, the reaction was 'you guys are crazy, nobody can put out a full operating system every six months, that's just madness'."
"Remember, at the time Debian was coming out unpredictably every three to five years, Windows was coming out with many years in between - it [a six-month schedule] was unheard of. We believe we've professionalised that release process - that process of integration and getting open source communities to work together to a six-monthly release cycle.
"Now everybody does it. Fedora does it every six months, SUSE does it every six months, we showed how it could be done. Now six months seems a really long time."
Allowing developers to release new features when they're ready, rather than waiting for the traditional April and October releases, would give them greater flexibility and get those features to consumers sooner, said Silber.
"A lot of our customers who upgrade every six months would be pretty well served by a rolling release, because what they want is the latest and greatest all the time. Every time we do one of those releases, we stop doing other development work."
Read more: Ubuntu CEO: two-year releases are only "an idea" | News | PC Pro http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/379507/ubuntu-ceo-two-year-releases-are-only-an-idea#ixzz2ItlbYC9V
Football Tips - Over 2.5 goals for Eskisehirspor, Trabzonspor and Betis Cup games
After a shocking day yesterday which saw the Pit down 23.40 to leave the aggregate total at +25.55, it's time to bounce back.
Eskisehirspor v Antalyaspor (Turkish Cup, Group Stage) KO 4.30pm
Over 2.5 goals
£10 @ 1.83
Eskisehirspor lay 3 out of 4 in the group and have a game against the top team Trabzonspor to come. They simply need something out of this game. Antalyaspor have scored 31 and conceded 27 in the league from 18 games and Eskisehirspor have scored 33 and conceded 24 in the same amount of games. So both are capable of scoring and conceding.
RESULT - 2-1 (+18.30)
RESULT - 2-1 (+18.30)
Trabzonspor v Mersin (Turkish Cup, Group Stage) KO 6.30pm
Over 2.5 goals
£10 @ 1.74
If this was a league game the smart money for Pit would be on under 2.5 goals. Trabzonspor are miserly scoring and conceding almost a goal a game. Mersin are near the bottom of the league and would usually play for a draw. But this is the group stage and Mersin are bottom. They have nothing to lose. Expect them to look to attack and expect there to be goals. This could be a very good game.
RESULT - 3-0 (+17.40)
RESULT - 3-0 (+17.40)
Real Betis v Atletico Madrid (Spanish Cup, 2nd leg Atletico lead 2-0) KO 7.00pm
Over 2.5 goals
£10 @ 1.92
Betis are 0-2 down from the first game and will simply have to come out and attack. Atletico can score goals from anywhere and will look to hit Betis repeatedly on the counter. This could be another cracker.
RESULT - 1-1 (-10)
OVERALL - +25.70
TOTAL - +51.25
RESULT - 1-1 (-10)
OVERALL - +25.70
TOTAL - +51.25
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)